Piggynap’s Blog | Zoe Piper

Zoe Piper, The Internet And Everything

Archive for January, 2009

Does your Adwords advert perform better when it’s at position 3 than position 6? Do you always want the top spot? That’s what ‘position preference’ is for – it’s a little feature that you turn on and off at campaign level so you can choose a range of positions you’d prefer your advert to show in.

So far so good. What baffles me is the negative effect position preference has on the ad’s performance.

adwords fail

An old client of mine wanted to spend a bit less on his Adwords since no-one’s buying much at the moment, but wanted his ads to keep showing. With his current bids he averaged position 1-2, so I set his position preference at 4-5. The idea was that his ads would show lower down the page and therefore gather less clicks.

He rang me this morning thinking he’d done something to his account and accidentally turned his ads off. I did a few searched and they appeared nowhere in the search results. Imagine my surprise when I had a look in his account and saw the error message to the left.

Now, his bids were exactly the same as before, but I wanted the ads to show lower. Surely by the Laws of Adwords this meant clicks would cost less? After all, the quality score would remain the same….right? So the maximum bid would get position 4-5 at least some of the time – I don’t see any excuse for the adverts to be turned off.

I know that a lot of factors could come into play here – a changed quality score, different bidding by competitors, etc etc, but what makes me think it’s a load of bullsh*t is when I turned position preference off:

adwords2

The ads started showing again in position 1. Obviously nothing wrong with the bid then!

The trouble with Adwords, and I’ve said it before, is that the features allow clashes and bugger-ups, and the error messages are woefully inadequate. For a paid service I think it’s pretty unforgiveable – it’s got to the point when you need to hire an expert to manage it not because it’s inherently complicated, but because it’s been made complicated.

Today is my penultimate day at 9xb, and it’s the last time I’ll ever sit next to Paul, or Emma – ex-Clearsite people I’ve worked with since I arrived here all fresh-faced and full of hope 18 months ago.

All very sad, but also a day full of greatness. I’ve had an egg Mcmuffin breakfast, been down the pub at lunchtime and been given my leaving present….

rockcats

Hell. Yes.

The Chuckle Brothers

Fantastic News!

If you’d like to see Britain’s best loved comedy duo LIVE, now’s your chance!

The world famous Chuckle Brothers have announced their 2009 tour dates, including shows in Sheffield, York and Scarborough.

I for one would love to see them in York on the 15th Feb but funds, alas, don’t permit this extravagance. On that day I’ll be at home, darning socks and putting another piece of the sideboard on the fire ready to cook the scraps I managed to scravenge from next door’s bin.

If you’re more solvent than I am, grab your tickets before they sell out! This show promises to be an awesome and entertaining medley of action, drama and humour!

Finally, the folk over at Webomatica have discovered what technology is really for…

Cat Recognition Software!

cat recognition

It seems that iPhoto 09 recognises cat’s faces just like peoples’. Thus proving that cats ARE people. I for one welcome our feline colleagues and look forward to them being elected to positions of power under the equality and diversity legislation.

The company blog is de rigeur nowadays, with everyone from web companies to furniture manufacturers taking advantage of the content delivery system a blogging platform offers. Some are just an excuse to boost the website size with promotional copy about products and services. Others are written by enthusiastic employees with interesting things to say, yet the interaction they engender is minimal, if it exists at all. Compare this with the popularity of private blogs and the situation looks drastic.

Why does the company blog fail so badly to interact with visitors?

Why does no one care what a company has to say?

Lack of Personality

Let’s be blunt, most company blogs have all the personality of a tax form. Either they never get past company news (they’ve opened a manufacturing plant in Slough) or they’re stuffed full of shallow, promotional fluff (there’s a new range of side tables!). No-one will read a blog that’s not interesting and most things to do with companies aren’t interesting. Sorry companies – no-one gives a crap what you’re doing.

Neutered Content

Some company blogs are written by employees who get to put their name on stuff – I can think of half a dozen web company blogs off the top of my head where this is the case. The trouble here is that content is neutered. Employees have to toe the party line so any personality and opinions remain firmly in their head – not on the company website. To take an example, it was suggested to someone I know that they write ‘more positive’ pieces in future, and not just use the company blog to slag things off. Being positive might be good for the company image but it lacks honesty and that all-important personality. If you don’t say something outrageous once in a while you’ll never spark a discussion.

People Don’t Like Talking To Companies

Even if you get as far as leaving a comment, who are you leaving it for? The person who wrote the post or the company? Chances are another employee will reply to you, but you weren’t trying to connect with them at all. It’s like ringing up a call centre twice and getting different people each time – there’s no continuity and no connection.

You might also be aware of the fact that your comment will appear on a company blog, so you should really leave a professional reply. If you joke or – god forbid! – swear it’ll probably get deleted. Your comment ends up as bland as the post was.

Competitors Don’t Want To Give You Credence

Company blogs are most likely to be read by people in the same industry – basically, people in competition with each other. If you leave a comment on a personal blog it’s ‘outside work’, but if you leave one on a company blog it suddenly becomes professional. Commenting on your competitor is like saying ‘I think you’re good’ and no-one wants to give their competitors reason to gloat. If you don’t comment on a company blog it’s as if you don’t care they exist.

After all this, are company blogs any good at all? Whilst there are loads of instances of successful ones – status blogs for example – there’s no real connection there. Quite simply, no-one’s listening.

Knols Give Me Rage

January 23, 2009 Google Comments

Google recently announced publication of its 100,000’th Knol, but 5 months on from launch where does the Knol service really stand? Heralded as Google’s answer to Wikipedia, a place for authoritative, quality information on a wide range of topics, has Google Knol lived up to expectations?

As e-consultancy puts it, No:

  • A lot of the articles are spammy
  • A lot of the content is copied
  • A lot of the formatting is crap
  • If you still want to browse, you can’t

I’d like to expand on this and add my own observations. They are not scientific or in any way fair, but that’s why I have Piggynap, right? :)

Bizarre

Firstly, how on earth do Google decide which Knols to put on the front page? Wikipedia choose based on such factors as; what’s interesting today. Featured Knols on the other hand appear to be the arbitrary ravings of madmen. For example, ‘How To Farm Lightning™’ appears alongside ‘Dreams Are Fun Because They Are Emotional Not Logical’ whilst the browse button is about the size of a pinhead. ‘Bag o’Knols’ is a poor translation of “we couldn’t be bothered to build a menu”.

Shoddy

They didn’t even register www.knol.com

Google claim that Knols are used by people in 197 countries. If their traffic is really that great why do some featured Knols have less than 5 page views? I think Google mean that people from 197 countries write Knols, which would explain the 100,000 bizarre articles in various grades of English. My last post on the subject said that Knols seemed to rank pretty highly but that no longer seems to be the case (cue some unscientific observations). Perhaps it’s related to this apparent lack of editorial standards?

Half-Assed

Writers can put adverts on their Knols, which sounds okay only a) most people will never get any traffic and b) you have to sign up for an Adsense account meaning Google have sold you another product and can potentially make money out of your efforts (assuming you buck the trend in a). Anyone familiar with the make-your-own-page service Squidoo will notice a strange resemblance, only Squidoo doesn’t pretend to offer authoritative content. It focuses on community and personal taste – “Dreams Are Fun” wouldn’t look so crackpot over there.

As with any free-page service, Google had to decide whether links from Knols would be nofollow. They are – except for those from “trusted users” (whatever that means). Nofollowed links, although annoying, do have the rather useful effect of discouraging spammers from posting. If there’s an easy way around the nofollow (i.e. become ‘trusted’) it will be gamed and therefore useless.

Finally, and this could just be me, you have to click the back button twice to get off a page. Argh!

How To Handle Bad Clients

January 22, 2009 Cock Ups Comments

Jim wrote a post recently about the value of being nice and it’s a great thing to bear in mind whether you’re an MD, a Studio Manager or just a lowly developer writing code all day. Being nice to clients builds good relationships and goes a long way to smoothing out any collaborative process. Sometimes however, even the most happy-go-lucky fellow can meet a complete ass of a client. Someone who’s uninformed, adamant they know best or incapable of even the most basic civilities. Being nice goes out of the window and you start to focus on damage limitation and self-preservation.

There’s no avoiding it, so how do you deal with the difficult client?

“I don’t Know What I’m Paying For”

This client is only being half-sarcastic. They really don’t know what they’ve paid for. They’re the client you thought you were designing a page for, but when presented with the design they say “Why doesn’t it make me breakfast? Breakfast is what I was most concerned about, so what have you been doing all this time?”

You reply “You commissioned a design…did you speak to anyone about breakfast?”

They say “I don’t know, I gave you a lot of money and I expected breakfast, but no-one talked to me about breakfast and quite frankly I’m disappointed!”

Unfortunately, you weren’t in the initial meeting and the Account Manager (who was) seems equally baffled.

What To Do

This client never even mentioned they wanted breakfast, and a breakfast wasn’t part of your brief. The lesson here is the value of having written parameters for your work, getting the agreement of the client and keeping them informed about exactly what they should expect for their money and when. The difference between a design and breakfast may have to be explained from the outset to avoid confusion.

“Where Are We Today?”

This client rings every single day, sometimes twice a day, and demands updates on your work. They ask constant questions about the work and in the amount of time it takes you to manage them, you could have achieved the Nobel Prize-winning breakthrough in Particle Physics you’ve always dreamed about. You politely answered their questions for the first week or so, but now it’s getting ridiculous.

What To Do

Unfortunately, someone has to handle the client. If you have an Account Manager, get them to have a chat about the value of leaving you alone. If you don’t, you’ll have to do it yourself. Assure them that whilst you’re happy to answer any questions they might have, your time would be better spent working on their project. You’ll send them updates as and when they happen, and reply to any emails at the end of the day.

“Do This….Now Do That Instead”

This client is incapable of leaving things be. They put £100 into an Adwords campaign and then pause it the next day because they’re worried about the click-through-rate. After a long conversation they change the budget and question all the keywords. Despite the fact they’ve never used Adwords before and you have, they make drastic changes to the campaign every few hours, throughout the night, so that in the morning the campaign is unrecognisable and they’re almost crying with despair.

What To Do

Micro-managers are at their worst when they keep changing their minds – ultimately it’s their money and they get what they want, but since it’s your job to do a good job you have to persuade them to leave things along. Repeat the phrase “I’ve got a lot of experience in this sector” or maybe “You’re paying me to manage it, so let me manage it”. You may have to repeat this several hundred times.

“I Don’t Really Believe That”

This client, believe it or not, doesn’t believe you! The stats are wrong, they just can’t see their site getting that many visits, and how on earth could a keyword cost ten pounds?!. They’re not making any decisions based on your flawed analysis, they’re going to try whatever business plan they’ve plucked out of thin air instead.

What To Do

Incredulity often springs from ignorance, and this client probably doesn’t understand Adwords/Analytics/Whatever well enough to trust it. It’s your job to present them with hard data, and then convince them that data is correct. If all else fails try the trusty line “Would I lie to you?”

“That Cost £50k But You Can’t Have £5k To Manage It”

This client keeps pennies in a safe and uses £50 notes as handkerchiefs. They commission a website but refuse to pay for consultancy, or put thousands into Adwords and try to manage it themselves. The website lingers somewhere round page 450, the Adwords gets 8million clicks on irrelevant keywords and the client decides it’s all a bad job and sets up a market stall instead.

What To Do

For someone will this level of pathology I really don’t know what to say. Hit them with a stick?

“Could You Just Build Me A Pyramid While You’re At It?”

This client moves the goalposts as often as most people brush their teeth. A text amend turns into a redesign and extra functionality is somehow required and it all has to be brought it on time and on budget. The trouble is, the Account Manager okayed the first bit and it was a slippery slope from there. You’re not even sure what you’ve agreed to any more but £60 seems a bit low for a new website….

What To Do

Be aware of the difference between being helpful and being taken for a ride. Some people hate to pay for things and they’d rather go straight to the developer because they’re more likely to get what they want. If a client starts to make unreasonable demands, or asks for several amends in a short space of time, refer them to the Account Manager and suggest they might need to renegotiate the budget. If you can nip it in the bud you might save yourself a lot of hassle in the long run.

All of these clients are a nightmare to deal with, but if you can achieve three things you’ll be halfway there:

Educate the client so they know what to expect and why.
Be authoritative, don’t be bullied and explain your progress with confidence.
Communicate with the client and with the Account manager so everyone’s in the loop.

carpsioWorld-leader in biscuits, Gentleman-Adventurer and Piggynap’s desk-sharer, Paul Carpenter has agreed to be interviewed in the Interests of Science and All Things Pointless. Ten difficult, probing questions on SEO were asked and his answers will surely set the tone for SEO in 2009.

Hi Paul. Thanks for agreeing to this interview. You’ve had a really varied career path…how did you get into SEO?

I was a caretaker originally, which was basically a batshit idea to mark time while the band I was in tried to make it big (hint: we failed). My real interest was in writing though, which landed me a job as a copywriter/technical author with software house in Leeds which doomed itself by basically doing the opposite of everything Joel Spolsky would recommend. The best thing about that job was working for a month in Seattle on the basis that I could “code HTML.” Those were the days! It all went bust in 2002, and I slipped into a jack-of-all-trades design and PHP programming role for a while with a couple of small companies. The programming aspect started to get a bit complicated for me, so I toyed with either doing pure design (and I was sensationally good at CSS back in the day) or trying to get into copywriting. The MD at 9xb asked me to R&D an online marketing offer and I began to get into the SEO/marketing side of things, which has kept me busy for the best part of the last 3 years. I’d still rather be a zookeeper though.

What do you like the most about the job, and what do you dislike?

I like the variety of learning about markets. There’s so many queer little niches out there with tonnes of knowledge to learn and digest, and I’m a sucker for anything obscure. The thing I dislike the most is clients who don’t appreciate the value you bring to their business. SEO is probably like most branches of marketing these days – there’s people who get it, and people who view it with a kind of relentless suspicion but, like a moth to the flame, want it to deliver them the earth. Hint: get off the damn phone and let me do my job!

Write me a poem!

I say I am an SEO
You look at me and then say ‘oh’.
Then brush past me to get to the cheese
Because nobody knows what SEO means.

You’re a bit of a technical wizard. How important do you think technical skills are to an SEO?

Want to see my wand? (Ed: No) SEO is becoming more and more of a marketing discipline, so you’d have to say that the technical aspect is lessening in importance. More companies take the time to build websites properly these days so there’s less margin in the whole ‘perform technical optimisation’ part of the job (which doesn’t stop some companies charging umpteen grand for it). Having said that, you need to know your way around a website so you don’t get scammed by developers, so I think it will always play a role. There’s a kind of technical understanding you need to decipher the SERPs, but a lot of it is just reading the entrails in my opinion.

What is your favourite biscuit?

Traditional digestive – it’s a good multitasker, being suitable for dunking plain or for carrying materials as diverse as jam and cheese. Lovely. The exotic charms of the fig roll aren’t far behind though.

You grew up in the hotbed of cultural activity that is Leeds. Why do you think Leeds and surrounding area has so many internet companies/SEOs?

Maybe all the financial and legal services that have flocked to the area over the last 15 years has something to do with it – they’re the kind of companies that have budget and understanding of marketing. There’s also this totally other number of students in the city, and you know what kids are like for tech. And of course if there’s one thing that motivates Yorkshiremen it’s money.

So: money + youth + prospect of more money = SEO/Web startups

What’s your favourite SEO tool?

I’ve got a soft spot for Yahoo! Site Explorer (bless their cotton socks). It mightn’t be perfect, but you can get a great feel of almost any market by running the top performers through it and seeing how they’re getting their rankings. Also great for divining those ridiculous auto-generated site networks, which reminds you of how far Google have still got to go to ‘rid the world of spam’ or whatever they’re driving for these days.

Are Google our Orwellian overlords?

I’ll pass you over to my Google account manager for an answer to that.

Sum up SEO in one sentence

Making products and services interesting enough to be linkworthy, whilst hiding a small cough behind your hand.

Eat Me Crunchy was your greatest success and some say the peak of your career. Where do you go from here?

Probably home to bed to reflect on that very fact.

I’d just like to say thanks to Carps for taking the time out of his busy day to answer my questions. Next week on Piggynap: Breaking News From Dave The Cleaner.

Galileo Who?

January 18, 2009 Awesome Comments

Thomas Harriot, a 17th century graduate of St. Mary’s (now Oriel College) Oxford, appears to be the first person ever to draw a picture of the moon. Papers attributed to early 1609 show that he beat Galileo by several months.

Thomas made some pretty awesome drawings of the moon’s surface, which are going on display at the London Science Museum on the 23rd July. I love old-school maps so here’s his moon-drawing for your delectation:

Credit: © Lord Egremont

Credit: © Lord Egremont

Sock Monkey Kook

UnderTheWillowTree

Kinichi River

Mitty77

Doodlebugfinery

Sunsetgirl Creations

Ariel Bariel

Rakieface

QDPatooties

Strumpfkunst