<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Piggynap's Blog &#124; Zoe Piper &#187; Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.piggynap.com/category/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.piggynap.com</link>
	<description>Zoe Piper, The Internet And Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Protect Your Brand Or Let It Grow?</title>
		<link>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/protect-your-brand-or-let-it-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/protect-your-brand-or-let-it-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piggynap.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick over at Blogstorm has posted about Interflora suing M&#038;S over brand bidding. Apparently Marks &#038; Spencer were bidding on the keyword &#8216;interflora&#8217; and the flower company took exception. Now, according to Google it&#8217;s OK to bid on someone else&#8217;s brand, but UK courts could take a different view &#8211; after all, there are all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick over at Blogstorm has posted about <a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/interflora-sues-marks-spencer-over-brand-bidding/1650/">Interflora suing M&#038;S</a> over brand bidding. Apparently Marks &#038; Spencer were bidding on the keyword &#8216;interflora&#8217; and the flower company took exception. Now, according to Google it&#8217;s OK to bid on someone else&#8217;s brand, but UK courts could take a different view &#8211; after all, there are all sorts of laws safeguarding people&#8217;s trademarks and the implications of keyword advertising are still being explored.</p>
<p>I really wish I&#8217;d taken a screenshot because it looks like they&#8217;ve stopped, but a few days ago <a href="http://www.purenet.co.uk/">Purenet</a> were bidding on the keyword &#8216;9xb&#8217; which, as you know if you&#8217;ve read my <a href="http://www.piggynap.com/about/">about page</a>, is the company I work for. Now, to get them to stop presumably we&#8217;d have to jump through lots of legal hoops to prove 9xb was a trademark and Purenet were damaging us by bidding on it. Personally I&#8217;d rather just create our own advert saying &#8220;Accept No Imitations, There Is Only One 9xb&#8221;&#8230;but that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>People bid on people&#8217;s brand names all the time and it&#8217;s only occasional that it goes to court. It will be interesting to see what happens in the M&#038;S case, but I think there&#8217;s a wider issue to explore &#8211; an issue to do with language and the internet in general. </p>
<p>Firstly, information is so widely (and easily) available that your trademark isn&#8217;t what protects you &#8211; it&#8217;s your reputation. If you search for Interflora and all you see is a load of news stories about them suing someone, it won&#8217;t matter how much they&#8217;ve kept their brand name to themselves. In an online environment you will <strong>never</strong> have full control over your brand name so you should concentrate on making your company image as positive as possible so other people mention you in a positive light.</p>
<p>Secondly, and reinforcing the fact that your brand name is never under your control, language evolves. Remember when &#8216;hoover&#8217; referred to a brand and not just an appliance? (If you do you&#8217;re older than me!) Several brand names have <a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_id=81">fallen into common usage</a> just because of their popularity. Google in fact <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-google.html">is one of them</a> &#8211; I&#8217;ve lost count of the American films I&#8217;ve seen where a character &#8220;googled&#8221; something (question &#8211; is this product placement for the digital age?). </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s stance is that imitation is the best form of flattery. If you google something, you&#8217;re finding it on Google and that can only be a good thing. A rival company bidding on your key term may not be a perfect parallel but I see similarities &#8211; your brand name is being used in a way that&#8217;s outside your control. Do you take drastic action and sue/launch a brand awareness campaign, or do you do a Google and let your company image evolve naturally?</p>
<p>My opinion? If someone&#8217;s bidding on your brand name, bid higher than them. If someone&#8217;s talking about you, talk back. You can&#8217;t hide behind a trademark all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/protect-your-brand-or-let-it-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Tip &#8211; Don&#8217;t Show Competitors Ads On Your Website</title>
		<link>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/todays-tip-dont-show-competitors-ads-on-your-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/todays-tip-dont-show-competitors-ads-on-your-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piggynap.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was checking one of my clients&#8217; Analytics package today to see how their traffic was doing &#8211; most of the traffic comes from natural search, with an ad campaign bringing in visits for something they don&#8217;t rank for. So far so normal. There was one referring site that puzzled me &#8211; I followed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was checking one of my clients&#8217; Analytics package today to see how their traffic was doing &#8211; most of the traffic comes from natural search, with an ad campaign bringing in visits for something they don&#8217;t rank for. So far so normal. There was one referring site that puzzled me &#8211; I followed the link and imagine my surprise when I saw my client&#8217;s advert right on the product page of one of their main competitors!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t set up their ad campaign &#8211; normally I opt out of the content network, but the client was opted in so Google had chosen a &#8216;relevant website&#8217; to show ads on. This just so happened to be the competitor &#8211; what&#8217;s more, the click-through rate was over 6% and the <b>conversion</b> rate was over 8%! The competitor obviously hadn&#8217;t seen this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/adfilter2.jpg"><img src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/adfilter2.jpg" alt="" title="adfilter2" width="235" height="139" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-162" /></a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lesson here somewhere&#8230;as a website owner it may seem like a good idea to earn a bit of money from Adsense, but please please please if you sell a product, filter your competitors out! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/todays-tip-dont-show-competitors-ads-on-your-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace, University of Phoenix Lead Internet Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/myspace-university-of-phoenix-lead-internet-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/myspace-university-of-phoenix-lead-internet-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rackspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piggynap.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw an interesting article about comScore&#8217;s &#8220;Ad Metrix Analysis&#8221; released a couple of months ago. It shows the biggest publishers and advertisers of online ads in America. Perhaps unsurprisingly MySpace are the biggest publisher (accounting for 51 billion of Fox&#8217;s 52):

Interestingly the University of Phoenix is the second-largest publisher:


Funny, I could&#8217;ve sworn it was Rackspace&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw an interesting <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/comscore-ad-metrix-june-microsoft-myspace">article</a> about comScore&#8217;s &#8220;Ad Metrix Analysis&#8221; released a couple of months ago. It shows the biggest publishers and advertisers of online ads in America. Perhaps unsurprisingly MySpace are the biggest publisher (accounting for 51 billion of Fox&#8217;s 52):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ads11.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-94" title="ads11" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ads11.jpg" alt="" width="315" height="311" /></a></p>
<p>Interestingly the University of Phoenix is the second-largest publisher:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ads21.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-95" title="ads21" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ads21.jpg" alt="" width="315" height="298" /></a><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ads2.jpg"><br />
</a></p>
<p>Funny, I could&#8217;ve sworn it was Rackspace&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piggynap.com/advertising/myspace-university-of-phoenix-lead-internet-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
