<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Piggynap's Blog &#124; Zoe Piper &#187; Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.piggynap.com/tag/google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.piggynap.com</link>
	<description>Zoe Piper, The Internet And Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Vs Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.piggynap.com/google/google-chrome-vs-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piggynap.com/google/google-chrome-vs-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piggynap.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been so much hoo-ha over the launch of Google Chrome I thought I&#8217;d do a direct comparison with the power user&#8217;s favourite, Firefox. Chrome is a barren wasteland at the moment &#8211; it&#8217;s literally a browser and nothing more &#8211; whereas Firefox is riddled with add-ons and tools. So how can I compare them? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been so much hoo-ha over the launch of Google Chrome I thought I&#8217;d do a direct comparison with the power user&#8217;s favourite, Firefox. Chrome is a barren wasteland at the moment &#8211; it&#8217;s literally a browser and nothing more &#8211; whereas Firefox is riddled with add-ons and tools. So how can I compare them? Well, I&#8217;ve chosen some basic key features I think no browser should be without and picked a winner in each category. Read on for the results&#8230;</p>
<h2>The Logo</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ff.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-111" title="ff" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ff.jpg" alt="" width="189" height="177" /></a></p>
<p>This is probably a matter of personal taste but I&#8217;ve always liked the <a href="http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/frog-blog/2008/09/exclusive-jon-hicks-creator-of-the-firefox-logo-interview/">Firefox logo</a>. It&#8217;s striking and fun and does exactly what it says on the tin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrome1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-123 clear" title="chrome1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrome1.jpg" alt="" width="189" height="174" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/pokeball1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-122" title="pokeball1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/pokeball1.jpg" alt="" width="183" height="177" /></a></p>
<p>The Chrome logo on the other hand looks uncannily like a Pokeball. Sorry Google, but I keep expecting Pikachu to jump out.</p>
<p><strong class="clear">Winner of Best Logo: Firefox</strong></p>
<h2 class="clear">The Address Bar</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/firefoxbar1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-124" title="firefoxbar1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/firefoxbar1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="120" /></a></p>
<p>Firefox 3 gives you URL suggestions when you start to type in a web address. These include your favourites and pages you&#8217;ve visited recently. Unfortunately the top suggestions are never what I&#8217;m looking for so I&#8217;m not impressed with this feature. What is neat is if you type enough letters it gives you the exact page you want &#8211; great if you&#8217;ve forgotten the address but know what it was about (it records the page title for reference).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromesearch1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-125" title="chromesearch1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromesearch1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="120" /></a></p>
<p>Chrome&#8217;s address bar on the other hand is also its search box. It has access to Google&#8217;s web results so offers you search suggestions as well as relevant web pages out of those you&#8217;ve already visited. Unlike Firefox it doesn&#8217;t just search the page title, it searches the whole page to find your phrase. This makes for fantastic results.</p>
<p><strong class="clear">Winner of Best Address Bar: Chrome</strong></p>
<h2>Web History</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ffhistory1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-126" title="ffhistory1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ffhistory1.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="236" /></a></p>
<p>Firefox&#8217;s history is functional. It shows web addresses or page titles in a neat little sidebar, so it doesn&#8217;t intrude on your browsing. It&#8217;s functional and practical &#8211; no complaints here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromehistory1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-127" title="chromehistory1" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromehistory1.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="257" /></a></p>
<p>Chrome&#8217;s history on the other hand is far more informative. You get the time of your visit, a cute little logo for each webpage and the links look exactly like links. There&#8217;s more space and you can see the full page title &#8211; Firefox offers a simple record but Chrome offers browsing options. The one letdown is the history appears as a separate page, not a sidebar &#8211; not good for multi-tasking.</p>
<p><strong>Winner of Best Web History: Tricky one this, but from a usability standpoint I think Firefox wins. Chrome&#8217;s history offers maybe TOO much information</strong></p>
<h2>RSS Reader</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ffreader.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-119" title="ffreader" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/ffreader.jpg" alt="" width="329" height="256" /></a></p>
<p>I really wanted to cheat here because I use the Sage plugin and it&#8217;s fantastic, but I&#8217;ve stuck to Firefox&#8217;s inbuilt RSS reader. You access your feeds through the bookmarks folder and get a simple list of headlines. It does exactly what an RSS reader should do &#8211; gives you the info you want without interrupting your browsing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromefeeds.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-120" title="chromefeeds" src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chromefeeds.jpg" alt="" width="329" height="156" /></a></p>
<p>Chrome also has an inbuilt RSS reader and just like Firefox you can access feeds through the bookmarks folder. Forget about sidebars or lists though &#8211; clicking on a feed opens the whole thing in<br />
your browser, presented as a complete (stripped down) webpage. It&#8217;s pretty but intrusive and defeats the object of RSS. If it doesn&#8217;t save me time I&#8217;m not going to use it.</p>
<p><strong>Winner of Best RSS Reader: Firefox</strong></p>
<h2>The Scores!</h2>
<p>Firefox<br />
<a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/stars1.jpg"><img src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/stars1.jpg" alt="" title="stars1" width="87" height="30" class="size-medium wp-image-135" /></a></p>
<p>Chrome<br />
<a href="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/star1.jpg"><img src="http://www.piggynap.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/star1.jpg" alt="" title="star1" width="29" height="30" class="size-medium wp-image-136" /></a></p>
<p>Even with Chrome&#8217;s stripped-back simplicity it just doesn&#8217;t deliver on convenience of use. Firefox wins by a hair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piggynap.com/google/google-chrome-vs-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
